In recent regulatory shifts, the minimum registered capital requirement for consumer finance companies in China saw a significant increase from 300 million yuan to 1 billion yuan (approximately $150 million). This new regulation, set to take effect, has prompted several consumer finance institutions to bolster their capital since last yearAs of February 14, marking nearly one year since the announcement, a review of business registration records reveals that eight consumer finance companies—including Shengyin Consumer Finance, Xiamen Jinmeixin Consumer Finance, Mengshang Consumer Finance, and Hebei Xingfu Consumer Finance—have yet to meet the 1 billion yuan threshold.

According to industry experts, the enhancement of registered capital typically draws from three key sources: undistributed profits, contributions from existing shareholders, and the introduction of new shareholdersHowever, the current landscape of the consumer finance industry is seeing a pronounced "Matthew effect," where fewer large players dominate the market, effectively squeezing out smaller firms that struggle to generate enough profit and reinvestMany of these firms are primarily owned by local banks or foreign financial entities, which themselves are grappling with their own challenges in business restructuring and expansion strategies within ChinaFurthermore, attracting strategic investors who meet the stringent regulatory criteria has proven to be a considerable hurdle for smaller consumer finance companies.

Deficiency in Registered Capital

Amidst these changes, the push for increased capital has become a pressing matter for many consumer finance companies, primarily to comply with the elevated regulatory standardsThe new regulations not only raise the minimum capital requirement but also demand that principal investors must hold at least 50% of the equity, up from the previous 30% threshold.

Reports indicate that several firms, such as Citic Consumer Finance and Jincheng Consumer Finance, have taken steps to increase their capital substantially

Advertisements

Notably, in a more recent regulatory disclosure, Sichuan's Unique Consumer Finance, for instance, announced an increase in its registered capital from 500 million yuan to 1 billion yuanFollowing approval from regulatory authorities, Unique Consumer Finance swiftly executed this change, reaffirming its commitment to aligning with the new capital requirements.

Moreover, the Zhejiang Ningyin Consumer Finance Company experienced rapid growth post its acquisition by Ningbo Bank and has since met the new capital requirement, subsequently opting to further increase its registered capitalEarlier this year, the Ningbo Financial Regulatory Bureau sanctioned an increase of approximately 689 million yuan, raising the firm's registered capital from 2.911 billion yuan to 3.6 billion yuanHowever, current corporate credit information shows that this change has yet to reflect in their business registration records.

Upon closer examination, eight consumer finance firms still fall short of the 1 billion yuan minimum capital requirementThe firms identified include Beiyin Consumer Finance, Hebei Xingfu Consumer Finance, and Jinshang Consumer Finance, to name a fewNotably, both Jinshang and Citic Consumer Finance have recently publicized their intentions to elevate their registered capital to the regulatory minimum.

To achieve this capital increase, Jinshang Consumer Finance intends to utilize retained earnings alongside cash contributions from existing shareholders, while Citic Consumer Finance plans a collaborative cash infusion of 300 million yuan from its major shareholders, including Citic Financial Holdings and Kingdee International Software Group Company Limited.

Challenges Facing Smaller Consumer Finance Institutions

Currently, the processes to increase capital for Jinshang Consumer Finance and Citic Consumer Finance are underwayA representative from Citic Consumer Finance remarked that the ongoing capital increase, reflecting shareholders' optimism in the consumer finance sector's future, would further fortify the company's capital strength

Advertisements

Looking ahead, Citic Consumer Finance aims to position itself among the top-tier firms in the industry, with plans to harness growth drivers reflecting its business trajectory.

According to insights provided by analysts from the Star Map Financial Research Institute, the sources for capital accumulation remain a crucial challengeGiven the decline in resident consumption rates and narrowing profit margins, smaller consumer finance companies are finding profit generation increasingly difficultThe industry's current climate heavily favors established players, fostering a highly competitive atmosphere that can lead to insufficient profitability for smaller entitiesAs a result, both current stakeholders and potential investors are growing cautious, wavering in their commitments to provide further funding.

Suzhou Xinzhiyan's senior researcher illustrated that this surge in capital contributions by consumer finance companies is a clear response to regulatory guidelines and simultaneously a reflection of their appetite for robust growth, enabling them to solidify their financial fortitude in the face of rising market dynamicsNonetheless, some smaller entities remain stagnant in their capital augmentation effortsThis stall in development may stem from disagreements among shareholders regarding capital source allocation, infusion scale, participant shareholders, and the distribution of contributions between stakeholders, which makes consensus-building challenging.

Market strategists have noted that the predominant sources of registered capital for licensed consumer finance institutions are contingent on shareholder contributions, which are directly tied to their financial healthIf the main shareholders are struggling, it is improbable that they would have the means to finance their consumer finance armsAmong the companies still not meeting the 1 billion yuan threshold, many are linked to local banks or foreign capital, which adds layers of complexity as they navigate their own business transformations and face challenges in collective decision-making regarding capital increases.

Another potential avenue for capital augmentation is attracting strategic investors; however, alterations in shareholder structure necessitate approval from national regulators and compliance with various stipulations set forth in current regulations—criteria that often restrict the pool of potential investors

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements